Difference between revisions of "Kitsch"
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
[[Image:Lamp.jpg|framed|left|A rock art image often interpreted as an eagle used on a lamp base.]] | [[Image:Lamp.jpg|framed|left|A rock art image often interpreted as an eagle used on a lamp base.]] | ||
+ | [[Image:Boxfront.jpg|framed|left|A rock art image on a box of matches.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Boxback.jpg|Thumb|The back.]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 09:36, 8 April 2010
Archaeological Kitsch
Archaeological items of iconic status become the subject of modern copies and re-use of the imagery. New Zealand items are not immune.
Maori
Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware and stamps. O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property[1].
|
Colonial
Barry Curtis Park in south Auckland has volcanic rock walls, reconstructed from a nearby farm site. The unfortunate result is what happens when landscape architecture captures archaeological reconstruction.
|
References
- ↑ O'Regan, G. 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds), Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes. Terra Australis 29 Accessed at http://epress.anu.edu.au/terra_australis/ta29/pdf/ch26.pdf