Difference between revisions of "Kitsch"
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[Image:Rock1.JPG |framed|left|A scarf with many images from rock art.]] | [[Image:Rock1.JPG |framed|left|A scarf with many images from rock art.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Scarf.jpg |framed|left|Another scarf.]] | ||
[[Image:Glases.jpg |framed|left|In the 1960s peanut butter was sold in packaging like these - which could be used as glases after they were emptied.]] | [[Image:Glases.jpg |framed|left|In the 1960s peanut butter was sold in packaging like these - which could be used as glases after they were emptied.]] |
Revision as of 09:06, 9 August 2010
Archaeological Kitsch
Archaeological items of iconic status become the subject of modern copies and re-use of the imagery. New Zealand items are not immune.
Maori
Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware, ceramics,postage stamps and even matchboxes. O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property[1].
|
Colonial
Barry Curtis Park in South Auckland has volcanic rock walls, reconstructed from a nearby farm site. The unfortunate result is what happens when landscape architecture captures archaeological reconstruction.
|
References
- ↑ O'Regan, G. 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds), Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes. Terra Australis 29 Accessed at http://epress.anu.edu.au/terra_australis/ta29/pdf/ch26.pdf