Difference between revisions of "Kitsch"
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
[[Image:Coffee.jpg|framed|left|Enamelled coffee table.]] | [[Image:Coffee.jpg|framed|left|Enamelled coffee table.]] | ||
− | [[Image:Coffee2.jpg|framed|left|Another enamelled coffee table.]] | + | [[Image:Coffee2.jpg|framed|left|thumb|Another enamelled coffee table.]] |
[[Image:Wall.jpg|framed|left|Enamelled wall plaque.]] | [[Image:Wall.jpg|framed|left|Enamelled wall plaque.]] |
Revision as of 13:28, 2 December 2010
Archaeological Kitsch
Archaeological items of iconic status become the subject of modern copies and re-use of the imagery. New Zealand items are not immune.
Maori
Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware, ceramics,postage stamps and even matchboxes. O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property[1].
|
Colonial
Barry Curtis Park in South Auckland has volcanic rock walls, reconstructed from a nearby farm site. The unfortunate result is what happens when landscape architecture captures archaeological reconstruction.
|
References
- ↑ O'Regan, G. 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds), Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes. Terra Australis 29 Accessed at http://epress.anu.edu.au/terra_australis/ta29/pdf/ch26.pdf