Difference between revisions of "Kitsch"
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<td width="25%">[[Image:Egg.jpg |thumb|left|Another enamelled dish.]]</td> | <td width="25%">[[Image:Egg.jpg |thumb|left|Another enamelled dish.]]</td> | ||
<td width="25%">[[Image:Plate.jpg |thumb|left|Souvenir ware.]];</td> | <td width="25%">[[Image:Plate.jpg |thumb|left|Souvenir ware.]];</td> | ||
− | <td width="25%"> | + | <td width="25%">[[Image:Enam2.jpg |thumb]]</td> |
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td width="25%">[Image:Enam3.jpg |thumb]]</td> | ||
+ | <td width="25%">Image:Enam4.jpg |thumb]]</td> | ||
+ | <td width="25%">Image:Enam5.jpg |thumb]];</td> | ||
+ | <td width="25%">Image:Enam6.jpg |thumb]]</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> |
Revision as of 16:46, 8 March 2011
Archaeological Kitsch
Archaeological items of iconic status become the subject of modern copies and re-use of the imagery. New Zealand items are not immune.
Maori Rock Art
Rock drawings seem to have been particularly prone to this - borrowings appearing on fabrics, glassware, ceramics, postage stamps and even matchboxes. O'Regan discusses this use in the context of cultural property[1].
|
Maori Other
Colonial
Barry Curtis Park in South Auckland has volcanic rock walls, reconstructed from a nearby farm site. The unfortunate result is what happens when landscape architecture captures archaeological reconstruction.
|
References
- ↑ O'Regan, G. 2008 The shifting place of Ngai Tahu rock art. in Sue O'Connor, Geoffrey Clark, Foss Leach (Eds), Islands of inquiry : colonisation, seafaring and the archaeology of maritime landscapes. Terra Australis 29 Accessed at http://epress.anu.edu.au/terra_australis/ta29/pdf/ch26.pdf